Community, Research

It’s like the liner notes said…

Faye Carol and the Marcus Shelby quartet

Tonight, as I drove across town to Jack London Square, I thought about a recent conversation about provincialism in local art. It turns out, the two neighboring galleries on Second Street unwittingly presented Oakland’s duality: in one gallery, ugly bangs, biker dudes, ironic trucker hats bearing insider slang. In another gallery, families dressed for a formal occasion: an art reception honoring African American musicians, and a jazz performance.

I’ve lived in Oakland for something like 14 years. The first few years, I found the cool café “finds” and warehouse parties really charming. But these days, I fear that I’m a resident out of sheer habit. So while I tend not to air unfavorable art criticism—it might not be the right time, the right venue, and so on—I had a realization I’d like to share. Inwardly-focused art that appeals to local scenes or styles bothers me because I’m over Oakland, or rather, I’m over the Oakland clichés used to self-identify among hipster-invaders: images of telephone wires, port cranes, Top Dog (YES, the one an Oakland museum staffer name-drop ped in the alt-weekly) etc. So at the exhibition featuring artists celebrating their gentrifying warehouse district, I was repelled by the self-aware marketing and predictability—finding beauty in mundane/abject urbanity, conventional materials, convenient scales of working, the privilege of claiming an outsider status. I think the primary criticism here—aligned with the general argument against provincialism in art—is that the show seemed to serve the purpose of building the cred among Oakland boosters, rather than the credibility of rigorous artists.

The show felt reminiscent of the pre-dot-com-boom Mission. For some that’s as a good thing, portending an “Oakland School.” For me, it’s unnerving. To paraphrase Lawrence Livermore, founder of Berkeley’s seminal Lookout Records, on his biggest and one of his last compilation records, by the time you read this, the scene will be long gone.

But I’ve gotten a renewed, precious sense of love for locality back — thanks to East Bay based Carol and SF-based Shelby, who performed at James Gayle’s opening reception at Swarm Gallery. I was transported within their original compositions from MSO’s Harriet Tubman suite, and a song from the Dynamic Miss Faye Carol’s forthcoming tribute album to Billie Holiday. I’ve heard about bodily harmonic resonance, and thought it was hocus pocus, but as soon as the first notes came out of Faye, I got shivers up and down my spine which lasted well after the performance ended.

Give thanks for Carol’s and Shelby’s commitment to excellence and integrity. See them and the Marcus Shelby Jazz Orchestra when they perform the Harriet Tubman suite at Yoshi‘s on April 2.

Standard
Research

Fear not contemporary art

A derisory tone prevails in most media treatment of contemporary art, whether controversial or not, a tone not appropriately skeptical or critically alert but smugly dismissive – and, I suspect, defensive.

This tone reflects little or no effort to imagine the risks of creative work in the postmodern context – the risk of self-deception, of squandering precious time and energy, of embarrassment through self-exposure. Instead, it echoes the tone of anti-intellectualism sounded in every statement in support or denunciation of public policy by every politician who dreads the stigma of “elitism” — and that seems to mean every politician, period.

–Kenneth Baker, “Saving the Soul of Art,” March 2, 2008, SFGate.com

Standard
Activist Imagination, Research

Attn: Miserable Idealists

In a look at inward optimism and social pessimism, Matthew Taylor calls for a new collectivism among progressives (“Why Life is Good,” New Statesman, January 3, 2008).

Taylor writes, “miserable idealists need to make a New Year resolution to look on the bright side. Pessimism is becoming an impediment to progressive politics.” He continues:

Progressives want the world to be a better place. We bemoan its current inequities and oppression — yet if we fail to celebrate the progress that human beings have made, and if we sound as though the future is a fearful place, we belie our own philosophy. Instead, we need to address a deficit in social optimism that threatens the credibility of our core narrative.

Similarly, my works for the upcoming Activist Imagination exhibition are inspired by how we see ourselves reflected in the world.

Standard
Research

Discovering Art Collectors

Dale Eastman’s “A collector’s guide to the exploding art market” (San Francisco Magazine, January 2008) is a thorough introduction to collecting art. It features advice from local gallery owners, a list of five artists, and a reading list.

Eastman’s reporting spanned an impressive breadth — including web resources, international fairs, downtown galleries as well as alternative and artist-run spaces. The East Bay is hardly mentioned (it is, after all, San Francisco Magazine) but Oakland’s Josh Keyes and Swarm Gallery (where I’ll exhibit a new project in February) are featured prominently in Jim Hughes’ beautiful photos.

The cover photograph — a salt and peppered white male with cool glasses peers into the camera as if examining a work of art — is somewhat vanilla compared to the idiosyncratic personalities profiled inside: renegade techies, queers, family men still adjusting to their new tax bracket. The subtext is heterogeneity: San Francisco is still quirky, and by (optimistic) extension, all comers are welcome. Hopefully the next feature will include collectors of color, and emerging collectors of modest means.

The profiles of collectors starts off with a photo of Jeff Dauber, a burly dude with full sleeve tats and an even fuller ‘stache. It’s a shot fired, a proclamation that you don’t have to belong to beautiful people society pages to collect art. (Then again, why not have bikers and bears replace the gallerinas in Swells?) I also enjoyed reading about Scott and Nancy Oliver. Presumably, they helped to build the Oliver Arts Center at my alma mater. I pictured them as hands-off philanthropists, when in reality they are the owners of a construction business and the kinds of folks who feed, house and help artists during site-specific commissions.

Thanks to Eastman for the insight.

Standard
Research

What kind of smile is that?

Its USA-Today-level feel-good factor aside, Jennifer Viegas reports for Discovery News on a new study about 4 kinds of smiles, selected from among the 50 varieties there are believe to be

ranging from triumphant ones to those that convey bitterness. … [Lead author Amy] Drahota described the first as an open smile “in which the lips are drawn back, the cheeks are raised and crows-feet wrinkles appear around the eyes.” Technically this is called a Duchenne smile, which may be the truest and most intense of all. The second smile type is like the Duchenne, only minus the “smiley eyes.” The third is a suppressed smile, “where the speaker is trying to hide their smile by pulling their lips in or down as they speak.” Finally, they denoted times when the speakers weren’t smiling at all.

I like the idea that not all smiles are alike. But is not smiling a fourth form of smiling?


Untitled (Lens Flare, Large Mirror) (detail), 2007, mirror, frame, lights, 26″ x 32″ x 2″

Standard
Research

Hidden History

Despite the web site’s use of Papyrus (never mind, it’s a snooty graphic designer in-joke), I love me some East Bay hidden history, and were I not predestined to attend THE JOURNEY SO FAR: 35 YEARS OF ACTIVISM, I’d be at the screening of Shellmound.

CCA Center for Art and Public Life and the Introduction to Community Arts Class presents:
A Film Screening of Shellmound, A Documentary by Andres Cediel
Followed by a Question and Answer Session with the Filmmaker
Tuesday, November 27, 7:30pm
Nahl Hall, Oakland Campus, California College of the Arts, 5212 Broadway, Oakland
For more information, please contact John Leaños at jleanos@cca.edu

Standard
Research

Getting Back on the Screenprinting Horse

“Art takes you to some funny places.”– Mario Ybarra Jr.

Just got back from Creative Screen Tech of San Leandro, CA. It’s a screen equipment and service shop, and was recommended by Thien Pham, the artist behind the brilliant I Like Food restaurant-review-as-comic-strip. CST will output film from my digital file and burn a stencil onto my screen.

The last time I used my screen was 10 years ago. I don’t have access to vacuum exposure units, and besides, I never did well with photo emulsion anyway, so CST’s help is crucial. I’m working on a booklet project, and I think screen printing is going to be the best method for achieving a desired effect.

The only thing I’m worried about is that my screen needs to be washed out. The stencil was hand painted with Speedball screen filler. I hate Speedball products — they’re for hobbyists, and are low quality. But when you’re inspired and faced with the task of supply procurement, which could take hours, Speedball’s wide availability is dangerously appealing. As Leland Wong points out, screenprinting is getting more specialized and expensive. When I took my screenprint class 10 years ago, there seemed to be many more local vendors.

I just hope these CST guys are able to wash out the embarrassingly nineties stencil.

Standard