<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criticisms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.christinewongyap.com/2010/01/03/criticisms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.christinewongyap.com/2010/01/03/criticisms/</link>
	<description>On Be(com)ing an Artist, Citizen and Arts Community member, by Christine Wong Yap</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 04:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dewittcheng</title>
		<link>http://blog.christinewongyap.com/2010/01/03/criticisms/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dewittcheng]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 05:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.christinewongyap.com/?p=1360#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Christine,

Of course there is nothing absolute or Olympian about anyone&#039;s writing, including mine, and readers should seek a varied critical diet. Thanks to the internet, such a diversity of opinion is available these days, so anyone interested in art ought to be contributing to the discourse, as you and many others already do.

My editors, however,  would be nonplused to hear that my modus operandi is too covert, and not opinionated enough! They always seem to be asking me to dial the prose down, to more reader-friendly levels—which I try to do without  neutering the content. And not every review can be a manifesto or esthetic experience; that is neither possible, given deadlines, nor desirable. I will cop to a preference for visual art that is visually interesting (old-school retinality), but I do try to keep an open mind should something new  draw my interest.

DeWitt Cheng]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Christine,</p>
<p>Of course there is nothing absolute or Olympian about anyone&#8217;s writing, including mine, and readers should seek a varied critical diet. Thanks to the internet, such a diversity of opinion is available these days, so anyone interested in art ought to be contributing to the discourse, as you and many others already do.</p>
<p>My editors, however,  would be nonplused to hear that my modus operandi is too covert, and not opinionated enough! They always seem to be asking me to dial the prose down, to more reader-friendly levels—which I try to do without  neutering the content. And not every review can be a manifesto or esthetic experience; that is neither possible, given deadlines, nor desirable. I will cop to a preference for visual art that is visually interesting (old-school retinality), but I do try to keep an open mind should something new  draw my interest.</p>
<p>DeWitt Cheng</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

